Which Purifier is Best?
A common question in my e-mail concernshow to choose the best air purifier. Too many buyers are missing the big picture, wanting to install a purifier as a cure-all for health or home environmental problems. The first step in finding the best purifier is asking: how serious is my need? If serious health issues are present (a majority of air purification buyers), serious steps must be taken. Please don't fall into the trap of denial. The second step is an honest air quality evaluation. Does your home have indoor burning; gas appliances, fireplaces, tobacco smoke, candles, or incense? Pets shedding dander and hair? Damp areas where mold breeds? Where does indoor air pollution come from, in your home? Here is the point: any of these continuous emitting sources will overwhelm even the best air purification machine. Filters are by nature passive, they must capture the offending substance by inhaling the air it rides on. With continuous source emissions, purified air is never really attained. If there are multiple sources, the situation becomes impossible. This is why ozone generating air purifiers are so-so-so popular, they are better at the easy "solution" many crave. They supply theactive ingredient, toxic ozone. With these machines, you trade one pollutant, often merely a nuisance, an "odor", for a more dangerous one: chronic ozone exposure. In very polluted home environments, ozone machines will effect noticeable improvement. They are especially good with persistent odors. Many naive users will be thrilled with the "clean" smell. As with the larger health picture, superficial and symptomatic relief often obscures the true cause of disease, allowing it to progress. Please note that the diatribe here is against ozone as a long term residential air purifier. Ozone as a suppressed alternative medical therapy is beyond the scope of this discussion. Every expert you can read will advise you to evaluate and remove sources before trying to decide which purifier is "best." Purifier Selection Of course, cost is a big factor for everyone. But many make the mistake of confusing initial purchase price with long term value. Many cheaper products have higher filter and maintenance costs, lowering their long term cost/performance ratio. A common trick in department store bargain air purifiers is to put inadequate or leaky prefilters ahead of the main filter, allowing it to clog repeatedly. The "cheap" purifier is really a loss leader for the overpriced filters. If annual filter replacement costs exceed the initial purchase price, somebody got robbed. I have read so many consumer reviews describing a series of purification purchases, each one unsatisfactory in some respect. I think that the average service life of many brands is surprisingly short. Of course there is no reliable public data on product life, just my subjective impression from reading. Again, the point is: get the big picture, which includes long term performance and cost evaluation. In air purifiers, lowest priced is usually not the best solution. Purifier Size A common sales ploy is "room size rating." Almost universally, consumers are led to under-installair purification devices. These room ratings are based on continuous top-speed operation, which is impractical from a noise standpoint. I advocate over-installing: air purifying capacity to rapidly clean the room, and then maintain a break-even status on lower speeds until a new episode of pollution occurs. Clean air delivery rates, air volume numbers, and air changes per hour supplied by vendors should be significantly deflated. Vendors routinely overstate the effective cleaning area of a machine because the area is calculated at the machine's high fan speed. Multiple Technologies The single most common mistake made by purifier manufacturers is inadequate prefiltering stages. Above, we saw a possible motive for intentionally doing this, but many just overlook it. Real filtering, especially chemical filtering, reduces airflow. I consider a true HEPA filter, or equivalent filtration capability, the central component of every real air purifier. A compelling replacement for the HEPA has yet to emerge. Electrostatic technology has maintenance and efficiency loss issues unresolved. Emerging technologies like ozone-free ionic, photocatalytic, and hydroxyl radical oxidation still need a filter-based system to support them. Electronics and AutomationI used air purifiers for almost 30 years before spending 100 days studying for this website build. The single thing I came to appreciate most is sensor-driven real-time response to real world conditions. Manually controlled machines cannot deliver optimum air purity because they rely on humans to recognize episodic peaks in pollutant levels, and then take action ("turn it up, I can't breathe...turn it down, I can't hear"). In themost obvious case, this is impossible during sleep. Automatic operation, turning the machine to idle speed when air purity is acceptable, is the biggest cost reduction strategy possible. In the future, gas and dust sensor driven automatic operation will be required for manufacturer survival. Some air purifiers rated well now are vulnerable because they still use manual, mechanical switches as their main human interface. MaintenanceAs a kid, I loved to build realistic working models; cars, planes, kites, trains, rockets, the gamut. Just buying a toy was no fun, I wanted to build it and feel the pride when it won a race or contest. I built my home from scratch, doing 100% of the work and using 80% recycled materials. But guess what? I hate air purifier maintenance! Routine prefilter vacuuming and washouts are soooo boring. Before you buy electrostatic units, make sure their collector plates really fit in the dishwasher. Ask yourself: what is my tolerance for an additional routine chore? One machine, which has sold over 5 million copies, creates so much ozone that steel parts inside rustin a few months (rust is oxidation). Does the machine you are considering have chronic maintenance issues? I call this the "hidden maintenance iceberg" ahead of the air purifier Titanic. Engineering vs. Marketing Lastly, consider the relative inputs of product development and product marketing into the price you are asked to pay for air purification. Everybody has seen the clever beer commercials, costing in the millions for a 30 second Super bowl spot. Did you know the price of many top brands of beer includes up to 70% advertising? How much did the celebrity appearances and infomercial blitzes add to the price of the purifier? At Air-Purifier-Power quality engineering is always rated above expert marketing. This "bias" is evident in the list below, with air purifier manufacturers rated in three broad categories. Top tier; Best IQAir NQ Clarifier Blueair Sharp Austin Air AllerAir WhirlpoolMiddle tier; Acceptable BemisAlen tech FriedrichNeoairElectrolux Amaircaire Honeywell PanasonicSharper Image (Hybrid GP) Delonghi Hunter Vornado Hamilton BeachLower tier; Not Recommended Holmes/Bionaire Sharper Image (Ionic Breeze) Ionic Pro Oreck Surround Air Ecoquest (Fresh Air, Living Air Air Purifier, Alpine Air Air Purifier, "Breeze AT", and Flair Air Purifier) This list is intended as a starting point only, research carefully. The old adage about no such thingas a free lunch applies to the air purifier market especially.
End Best Air Purifier?, goto Sitemap Go to top of page Popular PagesSharp Plasmascluster FPN60CX Review Whirlpool AP45030R Air Purifier Review Lifewise Ultra Air Purifier Friedrich c90B Air Purifier Review Filterless Air Purifier Airborne Illness

|